Adonis Georgiades attacked Nikos Androulakis over what the latter said at a press conference on the issue of phone tapping.

More specifically, the Health Minister recalled the PASOK President’s statements calling him “anti-establishment”, while today he attacked the judiciary for not withdrawing the case from the file.

“The “defender of justice” until yesterday linked it to the government’s selection of Supreme Court judges. In other words, he claimed that the Attorney General of the Supreme Court, Mr Tzavelas, is controlled by the government that appointed him,” A. Georgiades commented.

The Georgiadis post

“Nikos Androulakis, who for days has been accusing me of being anti-establishment, today attacked the judiciary for the decision of the Prosecutor of the Supreme Court not to withdraw from the file the case of the wiretapping, because he considered that the first instance conviction did not introduce any new evidence in the investigation. And this attack on him, the until yesterday “defender of justice” linked it to the Government’s selection of Supreme Court judges. In other words, he claimed no less than that the Attorney General of the Supreme Court, Mr. Tzavelas, is controlled by the Government that appointed him.

.
But Mr. Androulakis did not mention that in 2024 the Government of Kyriakos Mitsotakis passed a law whereby the Judges and Prosecutors themselves, in plenary session, vote in a secret process who they wish to promote to that position and that Mr. Tzavelas was elected first in votes by a margin both among the Judges and among the Prosecutors. The government simply appointed the person they themselves chose.

Now look at Mr. Androulakis, who has been taking his personal issue all day in the Public Sphere in an absolutely toxic way, attacking both Mr. Zisis, the previous Prosecutor who did the original Filing Act and now the current Prosecutor who ruled it valid. You find me a New Democrat who has attacked in the same way the President or the Prosecutor of the Single Judge Court of First Instance who issued the decision that Mr. Androulakis liked or who left any vulgar insinuation about them, as he did just now.

Of course, I am the “bad guy” who has been defending the Constitution and Article 90 for so many days and who has agreed with me so far as to the jurisdiction of the Court of Cassation and Justice, Mr Venizelos, Mr Pavlopoulos, Mr Thanou and today Ms Sakelaropoulou.

But I was the “anti-institutional” and Mr Androulakis the “institutional”…. to see how the masks fall off…